Correct Score Software Results: Sassuolo vs AC Milan 1–1
Quick Answer
Watch the original Sassuolo–AC Milan software recording and see the 1–1 winning-result card, with the matching forecast ranked second at 7.43%.
Frame extracted from the original recording; the matching 1–1 score is ranked second.
The original software recording supplied for this article lists Sassuolo vs AC Milan 1–1 as its second correct-score forecast, at 7.43%. The accompanying result screenshot shows a 1–1 correct-score tip, a 1–1 result, odds of 8.00 and a W marker.
Can a winning screenshot show whether correct-score prediction software works? It can document a selected example, but a useful assessment also needs the original forecast and its position in the shortlist. Here, both original files let you compare the second-ranked 1–1 forecast with the result card marked as a win.
Watch the original correct-score software recording
Original recording supplied by 1Football Prediction, approximately 12 seconds long. It shows the fixture list and the Sassuolo–AC Milan analysis screen.
The recording moves from the match list to a screen with three possible correct scores and over/under goals estimates. This lets readers see the surrounding forecast rather than only the score that matched the result card.
| Software position | Predicted score | Displayed model estimate |
|---|---|---|
| Score 1 | Sassuolo 1–2 AC Milan | 7.99% |
| Score 2 | Sassuolo 1–1 AC Milan | 7.43% |
| Score 3 | Sassuolo 2–2 AC Milan | 7.21% |
The matching 1–1 is Score 2. It sits just 0.56 percentage points below the leading 1–2 forecast. The first-choice prediction is an away win; the second and third are draws.
These are individual score probabilities. A 7.43% estimate for 1–1 is not a 7.43% overall draw probability, because other drawn scores are possible. Nor is it a measured success rate for the software.
The original winning-result screenshot
Original supplied result card. The selected correct score and displayed result both read 1–1; the card shows odds of 8.00 and a W marker.
The card’s details can be compared directly with the recording:
- Fixture: Sassuolo vs AC Milan.
- Selected correct score: 1–1.
- Displayed result: 1–1.
- Displayed odds: 8.00.
- Position in the software: second of the three listed forecasts.
The odds are those displayed on the supplied card, not a current offer. No stake or payout is visible, so this example does not establish a cash return.
Does a winning correct score prove the software is accurate?
The files show a clear match between a listed software score and a result card marked as a win. They also show that the matching score was not the highest-ranked prediction. Against the card’s displayed result, the first forecast of 1–2 and the third forecast of 2–2 do not match.
That distinction matters when discussing correct-score software wins. A first-choice hit and a matching score somewhere within a three-score shortlist are different measures. A fair record should state which one is being tracked and apply the same rule to every fixture.
There are limits to what these two files establish. They do not independently verify that the forecast was issued before kick-off, that a wager was placed, or that the displayed odds were available when the forecast was made. The result card says “Today”; the software list displays 11 October 2026 at 17:00, but its timezone and the official fixture details have not been independently confirmed here. This article therefore presents the files as a supplied software-and-result comparison.
Why the full software screen matters
Alongside the correct scores, the recording shows over 2.5 goals at 75.32% and under 2.5 goals at 24.68%. A 1–1 result contains two goals, so the result displayed on the card falls under 2.5.
In this example, the second correct-score forecast matches the result card while the more likely goals outcome does not occur. That is why the original recording is useful: it preserves the other estimates and makes the comparison more informative than a winning-result image alone.
To assess performance over time, save predictions before kick-off and record every result, including misses. Keep first-choice results separate from shortlist matches. If assessing betting returns, a complete record also needs selection rules, available odds, stakes and settlement details. One selected example cannot establish long-term accuracy or profitability.
Explore the correct-score software
Our Correct Score Football Software — ScoreCaster Pro lets users compare three correct-score scenarios alongside goals, 1X2 and both-teams-to-score estimates. The product page lists Windows and Microsoft Excel as requirements and 12 months of access.
The original video above shows the kind of score comparison readers can examine. For two further supplied examples, see 1X2 Football Correct Score From AI Software, which compares Manchester United–Tottenham and Ajax–Nijmegen software screens with their result cards.
For Sassuolo–AC Milan, the specific finding is straightforward: the software’s second-listed 1–1 forecast matches the 1–1 selection and result on the supplied winning card. Review both original files to see that comparison in context.
By 1Football Prediction. This comparison uses the original recording and result screenshot supplied for the article. 18+. Predictions are estimates, not guaranteed results.