Live
AI football software for correct scoreOver 2.5 goals tipsBTTS tipsCorners tipsLive goals tipsFree football predictions updated dailyAI football software for correct scoreOver 2.5 goals tipsBTTS tipsCorners tipsLive goals tipsFree football predictions updated daily
Published · Updated · By 1Football Prediction

Plzen 0–3 Union SG: Result and Forecast Evidence Review

The confirmed Plzen–Union SG result, the earlier forecast figures, and what missing screenshots prevent us from claiming about prediction performance.

Plzen 0–3 Union SG: Result and Forecast Evidence Review

UEFA records Viktoria Plzen 0–3 Union SG on 17 September 2026 in its official league-phase results. The result is confirmed; the article's earlier claim of a verified pre-match software capture is not.

What evidence is missing

The earlier article linked a model screenshot and a score card that are not available at their published storage paths. We have removed those broken image references. A cover image is not a substitute for the original output.

The figures below are preserved as an account of the earlier text, not independently verified software values:

Score Previously quoted probability
0–2 17.08%
0–3 15.11%
0–1 12.87%

They total 45.06%, leaving 54.94% for all other scores if they belong to a complete distribution. The top line, 0–2, did not match the result; the second line did. Without the original dated output, this is not evidence of a demonstrated pre-match hit.

Corrections to the interpretation

The earlier goals figures were over 2.5 at 57.67% and over 3.5 at 35.27%. Subtracting them gives 22.40% for exactly three goals, assuming both figures describe the same distribution. They do not establish a three-to-four-goal range with a stated coverage probability.

The article also quoted decimal odds of 26.50. Their raw reciprocal is about 3.77%, substantially below the quoted model estimate of 15.11%. Describing these as broadly agreeing was misleading. The price itself cannot be authenticated from the missing card.

A label such as “NB” or “GOAL AWAY” needs the product's definition. A small percentage beside a label should not be reinterpreted as a high-confidence signal without documentation.

What would complete the evidence

A valid case study needs the original file or screenshot, generation time, product version, fixture identity and market definitions. The confirmed result can then be compared with every selected outcome, not only the successful one.

See the correct-score product listing for the product description. The free website record is separate and cannot fill these missing product records.

Correction, 19 September 2026: Removed unavailable screenshots, unsupported scorer details and the pre-kickoff capture claim; corrected the goals and odds calculations. The original software evidence remains unresolved.

This article was revised with AI assistance to check the published text, available images and calculations. It is not an independent test of the software. Predictions are estimates, not guarantees. 18+. Support for gambling-related harm.