Live
AI football software for correct scoreOver 2.5 goals tipsBTTS tipsCorners tipsLive goals tipsFree football predictions updated dailyAI football software for correct scoreOver 2.5 goals tipsBTTS tipsCorners tipsLive goals tipsFree football predictions updated daily
Published · Updated · By 1Football Prediction

Flora vs Iberia 1999: Correct Score and Goals Explained

Quick Answer

Read the actual Flora–Iberia screenshot values, calculate the top-three share and understand why an unlabeled side percentage is not a BTTS probability.

Flora versus Iberia 1999 software graphic showing three correct scores and over-under probabilities

Saved output example. The visible 40% side value is not treated as BTTS without a documented field definition.

The saved Flora–Iberia 1999 graphic contains a ranked exact-score table and an over/under ladder. It does not contain a clearly labelled BTTS percentage. The earlier article's “BTTS 40%” interpretation has therefore been removed.

The visible exact scores

Score Displayed estimate
2–2 7.32%
2–1 7.24%
1–2 7.23%
Combined share 21.79%

The three estimates are close, but the image supplies no uncertainty intervals that would establish their ranking as robust. Most of the distribution lies outside this shortlist.

All three listed scores have both teams scoring. Their combined share is only part of all possible BTTS outcomes. It does not reveal the full BTTS probability.

The goals table

Threshold Over Under
0.5 98.02% 1.98%
1.5 90.96% 9.04%
2.5 76.67% 23.33%
3.5 57.38% 42.62%

Each pair totals 100%. The over estimates decrease as the threshold increases. From this table, exactly three goals receive 19.29%, calculated as 76.67 minus 57.38.

These are internal arithmetic checks. They do not establish the model's predictive quality.

Why the 40% side panel was misread

A 40% value appears near the left edge of the graphic, but its field is not clearly identified as BTTS. Assigning it that meaning created an apparent conflict with the listed scores. The correct response is to consult the product documentation, not invent an explanation for the label.

What is and is not evidenced

The stored graphic shows the team names and values above. It does not establish the precise fixture date, competition, product version or time the forecast was generated. It is presented as an output example rather than a verified pre-match Europa League prediction.

See Correct Score Football Software for the related product and the tutorial page for demonstrations. A paid product's performance must be assessed separately from the free website record.

Correction, 19 September 2026: Replaced the unsupported BTTS interpretation with screenshot-verified score probabilities; removed unverified fixture classification and universal product claims.

Revised with AI assistance using the available article evidence. Predictions are estimates, not guarantees. 18+. Support for gambling-related harm.

Explore the software in this article

Correct Score Football Software →

Windows · Microsoft Excel · 12 months access. Review screenshots, requirements and evidence before buying.

Read the evidence in context

For match examples, check the fixture date, forecast timing, product, market and result source in the article. A displayed score or winning screenshot alone does not establish an overall success rate. Missing or unverified details should not be treated as confirmed.

The free website model and paid software have separate evidence. Explore the evidence library or read the free model’s monthly results.

Published by 1Football Prediction. Report a correction, including the article URL and the source for the correction. Predictions do not guarantee outcomes.