Anderlecht vs PAOK: Screenshot Values and an Error Warning
Read the Anderlecht–PAOK screenshot with a clear distinction between displayed estimates, sample frequencies and an unresolved spreadsheet error.

Original saved output, including an unresolved spreadsheet error. It is not presented as a validated pre-match forecast.
The stored Anderlecht–PAOK image shows a 2–2 header, a 1X selection and several goals figures. It also shows a #VALUE! spreadsheet error in the first-half section. That error needs investigation before the output can be treated as a validated run.
What is visible
| Field | Screen value |
|---|---|
| 1X | 69.1% |
| Over 1.5 | 85.3% |
| Over 2.5 | 66.0% |
| GG / BTTS | 64.2% |
| HT 2 | 35.0% |
| First-half central over-0.5 calculation | #VALUE! |
The lower first-half table contains 60%, 50% and 10% on its over lines. These should not be substituted for the broken calculated cell without establishing what the tables measure.
Historical frequency is not certainty
Team panels display 80% scoring values and 100% conceding values. The earlier article described the conceding entries as certainty-like model forecasts. The underlying match list and definitions are needed to identify the sample behind them; a historical 100% frequency never establishes a guaranteed next outcome.
The image's top labels name domestic competitions for each team. It does not independently confirm the European tie, venue, aggregate score or capture time previously asserted in the article.
Reading the combination
For 1X at 69.1% and over 1.5 at 85.3%, the joint probability could lie between 54.4% and 69.1%, assuming valid, consistent marginal probabilities. The combination label alone supplies no exact joint figure.
The 2–2 score would imply four goals and both teams scoring, but its presence does not validate the other estimates or prove an actual match outcome.
What to check in the workbook
Preserve the original output, identify the product and version, inspect the error's input dependencies, and confirm the market definitions. Do not hide the error or replace it with a convenient number. A later corrected run should have a new timestamp.
View the source image. For available products see the store, and for help matching a screenshot to a version use support. This article does not establish paid-product accuracy.
Correction, 19 September 2026: Identified the visible spreadsheet error, removed unsupported match narrative and corrected the confusion between sample tables and calculated probabilities.
Revised with AI assistance using the available article evidence. Predictions are estimates, not guarantees. 18+. Support for gambling-related harm.
